Simulation of Sound Spectra of Complex Didgeridoo Interior Forms
Computer Aided Didge Sound Design

Dr. Frank Geipel


Frequenzmuster im Didgeridoo

Motivation
Every advanced didgeridoo player will have found that the sound characteristics (toots, timbre, ...) and the playability (back-pressure, responsiveness…) are essentially influenced by the inside form and the material of the instrument. I know many players who are forever searching for a didgeridoo with their ideal sound and playability because of this. Often it’s a very sobering search because very few of the instruments offered on the didgeridoo “market” fully meet one’s expectations. And many of those one-offs that do are also very expensive.
 

This situation prompted me to get into building didgeridoos. I soon found that thorough preparation could put me more than half-way to my goal and spare me many failed building experiments.


The way to the own ideal didge

Frank prüft die Leimfuge eines neuen Didges - sie ist nicht mehr zu sehen ...
1) Building methods

In the didge scene there are opportunities to thoroughly inform yourself about the crafting skills needed to make the instrument. Because I wanted to work with wood, I had the choice between the sandwich method (practised by Eddy Halat, Stefan Thiel, Jan-Ole Haber, Kay Reimer, and others) and the drilling method (practised by Walter Strasser, Johannes Schildkamp and others in several variations). Unfortunately I’ve yet to hear of “trained termites” in central Europe.
Interesting though the drilling method practised by a few craft artists is, I opted for the simpler sandwich method because it allows considerably more complex internal forms to be realised.
While I was researching the methods I got to know some interesting didgeridoo makers, including the Test-A-Doo experimenter, Kay Reimer, whose acoustic experiments impressed me very deeply. I followed his web instructions to make my own first wooden didgeridoo.
 

Sehr gelungen - Franks letztes Didge!

Birch wood didgeridoo fundamental tone F# first overblow A2

2) Using wood

In regard to material properties, I prefer hardwood varieties of high density and high elasticity (elasticity modules). These are the closest to eucalyptus and least restrict the higher overtones. For the selection of suitable wood varieties I have compiled some interesting wood data on our website which can be very helpful to gauge the resonance qualities and the ease of working.
Specifically, I use e.g. plum/damson, hawthorn (tends unfortunately to split), hop hornbeam, hornbeam, oak, yew (heavy, practically never splits, high elasticity), ash, robinia and birch (medium hard and medium heavy but very high elasticity).


3) Bore shapes

Frank beim Grübeln - irgendie muss die Simulation zu schaffen sein! How do you achieve suitable didgeridoo interior shapes, which provide the desired sound characteristics? Here each didgeridoo craftsman has made his own experiences, which of course commercially motivated craftsmen will only rarely share. As an interested scientist, I had the idea of finding such interior shapes through computer simulation, hence avoiding a multitude of unsuccessful building experiments.

 

Unfortunately research on this topic only provides suitable mathematical solutions for simple cylindrical and exactly conical tubing shapes (formula sides 1 and 2).



I was not very interested in these simple, idealized forms, because the sound characteristics that can be generated in this way are very limited and are not correct in the case of deviations from these idealized forms.
 

I had to find another method! -- >

back to top