Simulation of Sound Spectra of Complex Didgeridoo Interior Forms
Dr. Frank Geipel
MotivationEvery advanced didgeridoo player will have found that the sound characteristics (toots, timbre, ...) and the playability (back-pressure, responsiveness…) are essentially influenced by the inside form and the material of the instrument. I know many players who are forever searching for a didgeridoo with their ideal sound and playability because of this. Often it’s a very sobering search because very few of the instruments offered on the didgeridoo “market” fully meet one’s expectations. And many of those one-offs that do are also very expensive.
In the didge scene there are opportunities to thoroughly inform yourself about the crafting skills needed to make the instrument. Because I wanted to work with wood, I had the choice between the sandwich method (practised by Eddy Halat, Stefan Thiel, Jan-Ole Haber, Kay Reimer, and others) and the drilling method (practised by Walter Strasser, Johannes Schildkamp and others in several variations). Unfortunately I’ve yet to hear of “trained termites” in central Europe. Interesting though the drilling method practised by a few craft artists is, I opted for the simpler sandwich method because it allows considerably more complex internal forms to be realised. While I was researching the methods I got to know some interesting didgeridoo makers, including the Test-A-Doo experimenter, Kay Reimer, whose acoustic experiments impressed me very deeply. I followed his web instructions to make my own first wooden didgeridoo.
2) Using wood
Unfortunately research on this topic only provides suitable mathematical
solutions for simple cylindrical and exactly conical tubing shapes (formula
sides 1 and 2).
|